Corporate Security

The Security Managers Who Cried Wolf – Published on Peerlyst

A very personally opinionated piece on how the average security day job differs from a more general norm and how that can become a death knell for non-reactive management and innovation.

In any job of almost any kind there will be people who take their work home (literally and mentally) and those that clock off and forget it. The balance of former to latter goes up as you climb the corporate ladder, possibly levelling out then going down in the really rarified heights of majority-shareholding nearing-retirement executive board members. bellcurveACurve (a) –ish.

Conversely, in any team of say 10 security professionals I reckon 6-8 are doing more ‘discretionary’ hours than an average Joe could be coaxed into with either a giant stick or a monster carrot (reminds me of an alternative awareness campaign that was proposed in Olso, but what happened in Norway, stays in Norway). So if mapped, I reckon it would look far more like the profile of a runaway truck – pretty high at the start, with a long plateau, then a cliff-like drop at the end.

Why does the passion plummet?

Many do the job because they’re switched on by learning…actively enjoying the pursuit, capture and sharing of new skills and ideas.

A surprisingly large other subset will do it because they genuinely care whether or not your network is secure. It really is personal for most, both from a pride and integrity point of view. Even those who might not be as personally motivated often put in shedloads of extra hours. Usually out of loyalty to the team. Because of the high percentage of pros who genuinely love what they do, there’s frequently great camaraderie and mutual support on offer

It takes some seriously prolonged effort to crush those urges. Perhaps you’ll manage it with redundancy round three, after which the survivors pick up the work of lost ‘surplus’ colleagues…3 FTE worth of stuff to do instead of the 1.75 or 2 they managed before.

Or maybe it’ll come after the fourth lot of expensive consultants tell them to do what they’ve been recommending for years (or something flying squarely in the face of what they know are your top security priorities). Adding insult to injury by invoicing an amount equivalent to an annual salary for a pricey plan, for an almost impossible to resource masterplan…given what was spent on the planning.

If you’d like to read on, the rest is published on Peerlyst. It’s a relatively young networking site that’s the brainchild of Limor Elbaz, a woman who really knows what she wants.

There’s long been a space between snack-size reviews, vendor’s own write ups and sponsored adds around IT and security solutions. Limor wanted to fill that with real user experience and debate and Peerlyst was born. It’s doing a good job with that and a lot more.

In an era when IPOed Twitter is shaping content to meet the facile user count demands of investors, LinkedIn is full of “10 ways to succeed according to a bloke with an opinion” and Facebook is full of kids and cats (including mine, so not judging), it’s a refreshing change.

Perhaps take a look.

Want to add to the discussion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.